Singh

Singh v. Ashcroft

Good Law
110 F. App'x 794
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 2004No. 03-71447California301 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jarnail Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) summary affirmance without opinion of the order of an Immigration Judge (IJ) denying Singh’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility finding and a denial of asylum, and we uphold the IJ’s decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. See Malhi v. INS, 336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding. Singh did not give consistent or complete explanations regarding when he lost his passport, how he was able to fill out his asylum application with numerical information from his lost passport, and who actually prepared and signed his asylum application. These incomplete explanations, as well as the IJ’s observation of Singh’s visible nervousness when answering questions about his passport, provide substantial support for denying his asylum application on the basis of an adverse credibility finding. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.