Lieman

MEMORANDUM **

Jahja Lieman, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s opinion denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Taha v. Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 623, 626 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Lieman failed to establish a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of his Chinese ethnicity or Christian beliefs because a large number of his similarly-situated family members reside in Indonesia without incident. See Aruta v. INS, 80 F.3d 1389, 1395 (9th Cir.1996); see also Singh v. INS, 134 F.3d 962, 967 (9th Cir.1998) (recognizing that general lawlessness and violence without an appreciably different risk to the petitioner is not enough to support a claim of asylum).

Lieman therefore necessarily failed to meet the more stringent evidentiary standard required for withholding of removal. See Rostomian v. INS, 210 F.3d 1088, 1089…