Romero-Suarez

United States v. Romero-Suarez

Good Law
111 F. App'x 923
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 2004No. 03-10535California154 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Javier Romero-Suarez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Romero-Suarez’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.