Widjaja

MEMORANDUM **

Shinta Riawaty Widjaja, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a). Because the BIA affirmed the IJ’s decision without opinion, the IJ’s decision is considered the final agency determination. See Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 849 (9th Cir.2003). We review that decision under the substantial evidence standard and must uphold it unless the evidence compels a reasonable factfinder to reach a contrary result. See Hakeem v. INS, 273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition.

To establish eligibility for asylum, Widjaja must demonstrate that she is unable or unwilling to return to Indonesia because of past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of a statutorily protected ground. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir.2003).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Widjaja has not *245 suffered past persecution. See Ghaly v. INS, 58…