El Hefnawi v. Ashcroft

Good Law
113 F. App'x 846
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 2004No. 03-71682California289 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Feras El Hefnawi, who claims to be a native of Palestine and stateless, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, affirming without *847 opinion the decision of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”). The IJ found that El Hefnawi was not credible and therefore denied his application for asylum and for withholding of removal and voluntary departure, and ordered his removal to Israel or alternatively to the Palestinian Authority. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , and we deny the petition.

The IJ’s adverse credibility determination was supported by substantial evidence. See Al-Harbi v. INS, 242 F.3d 882, 888 (9th Cir.2001) (stating that the IJ’s adverse credibility finding is reviewed for substantial evidence and therefore must be upheld unless the petitioner demonstrates that “no reasonable factfinder could conclude that he is ineligible for relief from removal”). The IJ relied on contradictions between El Hefnawi’s testimony and his statements at the border regarding his reasons for seeking asylum. The IJ also relied on numerous inconsistencies in El Hefnawi’s testimony regarding material aspects of his claim, such as his claimed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.