Joaquin

United States v. Joaquin

Good Law
114 F. App'x 349
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 3, 2004No. 04-10258; D.C. No. CR-03-01001-PGRCalifornia320 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Arlene Joaquin appeals the 18-month sentence imposed following her guilty plea to transporting illegal aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(1). Joaquin’s waiver, in her plea agreement, of her right to appeal her sentence was superseded by the district court’s advice, at sentencing, that she had the right to appeal. See United States v. Buchanan, 59 F.3d 914, 917-18 (9th Cir.1995). Joaquin contends that the district court plainly erred in making an upward adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 2Ll.l(b)(5) for creating a substantial risk of serious bodily harm, and that the district judge’s application of this sentencing enhancement, without proof to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt or an admission by Joaquin, violated her Sixth Amendment rights under Blakely v. Washington, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2531 , 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and United States v. Ameline, 376 F.3d 967 (9th Cir.2004).

Because the portion of Joaquin’s sentence that is clearly unaffected by Blakely and Ameline has expired or will expire shortly, we remand the case to the district court for whatever action it determines to be proper under the circumstances. See United States v. Castro, 382 F.3d 927, 928 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.