Tarin-Somera

United States v. Tarin-Somera

Good Law
114 F. App'x 891
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 2004No. 03-10098California228 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Sergio Tarin-Somera appeals his jury-trial conviction and 77-month sentence for illegal re-entry into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a), with a sentencing enhancement pursuant to § 1326(b)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Tarin-Somera contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements concerning his identity. We review the denial of a motion to suppress de novo, see United States v. Jones, 286 F.3d 1146, 1150 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.

Tarin-Somera asserts that statements regarding his identity made to the arresting officer and border patrol agent should have been suppressed, because they were obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. However, this Court has previously concluded that evidence of a person’s identity itself is never suppressible. See United States v. Guzman-Bruno, 27 F.3d 420, 421-22 (9th Cir.1994); quoting INS v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032, 1039 , 104 S.Ct. 3479 , 82 L.Ed.2d 778 (1984) (“[t]he ‘bod/ or identity of a defendant or respondent in a criminal or civil proceeding is never itself suppressible as a fruit of an unlawful arrest ... ”). Accordingly,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.