Scott

United States v. Scott

Good Law
115 F. App'x 352
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 2004No. 03-10663California215 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

John Scott appeals his 12-month and 1-day sentence imposed after the revocation of his term of supervised release. Scott was convicted of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base within 1000 feet of a university, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 860 (a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Scott has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Scott has filed a pro se *353 supplemental brief and a pro se reply-brief.

Upon independent review of the record, pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and our review of the briefs filed, we conclude there are no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

The Clerk is instructed to file appellant’s pro se opening brief received on June 14, 2004, appellee’s answering brief received on July 26, 2004, and appellant’s pro se reply brief received on August 9, 2004.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.