Singh

MEMORANDUM **

Hira Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Where the BIA has reviewed the IJ’s decision and incorporated parts of it as its own, we review those parts of the IJ’s decision as the BIA’s. Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir.2002). We review the BIA’s adverse credibility finding for substantial evidence. Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility finding. See id. at 1045 . The record shows that the BIA and IJ had reason to question Singh’s credibility and gave Singh the opportunity to gather and produce corroborating evidence. Singh failed to produce material, easily available corroborating evidence or to offer a credible explanation for his failure. See Sidhu v. INS, 220 F.3d 1085, 1091-92 (9th Cir.2000).

In particular, Singh failed to corroborate his testimony that he and Bhinder…