Patel
Inland Valley Development Agency v. Patel
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Appellants Vibhakerbhai B. Patel, Vimalaben V. Patel, Praful B. Patel, Nimben P. Patel, and Vijay B. Patel appeal the district court’s order sua sponte remanding to state court an eminent domain action brought by Appellee Inland Valley Development Agency. The Patels removed the action to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1443 ; therefore, we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (d). We review de novo, Nebraska ex rel. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. v. Bentson, 146 F.3d 676, 678 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm.
Section 1443 provides an avenue for removal of a case commenced in state court against any person who is denied or cannot enforce in state court a right under any law providing for equal civil rights. A successful petition for removal brought pursuant to section 1443 must satisfy two criteria. First, petitioners must assert rights allegedly denied them that arise under a federal law “providing for specific civil rights stated in terms of racial equality.” Johnson v. Mississippi, 421 U.S. 213, 219 , 95 S.Ct. 1591 , 44 L.Ed.2d 121 (1975) (citing Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S. 780, 792 , 86 S.Ct. 1783 , 16 L.Ed.2d 925 (1966)). Second, petitioners must assert that…