United States v. Jackson

Good Law
116 F. App'x 839
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 2004No. 03-50484California332 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Robert Jackson appeals his sentence for conspiracy to distribute cocaine base (crack) arguing that as a result of the government’s breach of the plea agreement he was deprived the benefit of the Safety Valve adjustment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (f). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate Jackson’s sentence and remand for resentencing before a different judge.

The government materially breached the plea agreement when the Assistant United States Attorney argued to the district court that Jackson held a leadership role in the conspiracy. This violated the government’s stipulation in the plea agreement that Jackson “was not an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor of others.” We reject the government’s assertion that it cured the breach at the last minute by withdrawing the leadership argument immediately prior to the imposition of sentence. Even if a material breach were curable, it was not cured here. Jackson did not get the benefit of his plea bargain once he was forced to testify under oath without the benefit of the government’s stipulation that he was not a leader.

Because the government materially breached the plea agreement,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.