Javed
Javed v. Ashcroft
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM *
Asif Javed, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision to affirm the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of *889 removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , and we grant the petition in part, deny the petition in part, and remand to the BIA for further proceedings.
We review adverse credibility rulings under the substantial evidence standard. Hoque v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1190, 1194 (9th Cir.2004). Here, the IJ’s adverse credibility finding is supported by substantial evidence. Inconsistencies and material omissions in Javed’s testimony, non-responsive answers, and a lack of corroboration undermined his credibility. Accordingly, Javed fails to qualify for asylum, and he necessarily fails to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Alvarez-Santos v. INS, 332 F.3d 1245, 1254-55 (9th Cir.2003).
Although the IJ denied Javed’s asylum and withholding claims on the basis of his adverse credibility ruling, he failed to explain his reasons for rejecting Javed’s CAT claim. Because…