Kirakosyan

Kirakosyan v. Ashcroft

Good Law
117 F. App'x 564
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 2004No. 03-72085California236 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Vladimir Kirakosyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review the IJ’s adverse credibility finding for substantial evidence. Far ah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination because Kirakosyan testified that he was sought by the police because of his interview with an Armenian radio journalist, his “written testimonies” about military wrongdoing, and his statement that the death of a military phot was not accidental. However, Kirakosyan did not refer to any of these allegations in his asylum application. See Alvarez-Santos v. INS, 332 F.3d 1245, 1254 (9th Cir.2003). In addition, contrary to Kirakosyan’s contentions, the IJ’s adverse credibility finding was sufficiently detailed. See id.

The IJ adequately analyzed Kirakosyan’s withholding of removal claim. See id. at 1255…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.