Martinez-Islas

Martinez-Islas v. Ashcroft

Good Law
117 F. App'x 589
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 2004No. 03-72979; Agency Nos. A74-809-110, A74809-111, A74-809-112California285 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jorge Martinez-Islas, his spouse Maria Escobedo-Jaimes, and their daughter Juanita Martinez-Escobedo, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of their motion to reopen or reconsider. We review for abuse of discretion. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002). We deny the petition.

In their motion to reopen or reconsider, petitioners requested that the BIA consider the availability of repapering relief. See Alcaraz v. INS, 384 F.3d 1150, 1152-53 (9th Cir.2004) (describing the “safety-net provision for aliens rendered ineligible for suspension of deportation because of the retroactive stop-time rule” referred to as “repapering” relief). However, repapering relief is only available to aliens who are statutorily eligible for cancellation of removal. See id. at 1155 ; see also 65 Fed. Reg. 71273 , 71274 (Nov. 30, 2000) (“Repapering applicants must also be statutorily eligible for cancellation of removal ... at the time of application.”). Here, the BIA correctly found that petitioners were ineligible for cancellation of removal because they overstayed their voluntary departure period. See 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.