Mualim

Mualim v. Ashcroft

Good Law
118 F. App'x 329
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 2005No. 03-73978; Agency No. A77-821-685California524 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*330 MEMORANDUM **

Wijayanto Mualim, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir.2000), and reverse only if the evidence compels a contrary conclusion, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Mualim’s experiences in Indonesia did not rise to the level of persecution. See Ghaly v. INS, 58 F.3d 1425, 1431 (9th Cir.1995) (holding that persecution is an “extreme” concept). Being teased as a child and assaulted for money in high school does not rise to a level of persecution on account of an enumerated ground. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir.2003) (being teased, bothered, discriminated against, harassed, and fired from job because of religious beliefs did not rise to level of persecution);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.