Zhizhong Liu v. Ashcroft

Good Law
119 F. App'x 181
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 2005No. 03-71285California301 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Zhizhong Liu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review an adverse credibility finding for substantial evidence and will uphold the IJ’s decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. See Wang v. INS, 352 F.3d 1250, 1253, 1257 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s decision. Liu’s testimony was implausible, internally inconsistent, and inconsistent with his application regarding, inter alia, the distribution of his manuscript, how it was copied, why he wanted to have it published, and whether it could, in fact, lead to any persecution. See id. at 1257-59 ; Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1151-52 (9th Cir.1999). Moreover, Liu’s testimony conflicted with documentary evidence and the State Department Report on several key grounds, including the publicity and common knowledge of the Tiananmen Square incident. See Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1044 (9th Cir.2001) (stating that State…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.