Hovhannisyan

Hovhannisyan v. Ashcroft

Good Law
119 F. App'x 184
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 2005No. 03-73567; Agency No. A78-443-859California361 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Edgar Hovhannisyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an Immigration *185 Judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review an adverse credibility determination for substantial evidence. Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition.

Hovhannisyan admitted that upon arriving in the United States, he told immigration officials that he feared returning to Armenia because people were after him for money and did not mention any of the politically-motivated attacks set forth in his asylum application. While statements given during airport interviews are not always valuable impeachment sources, see Singh v. INS, 292 F.3d 1017, 1021-24 (9th Cir.2002), here the statement’s reliability is not in question because Hovhannisyan admitted making it. See Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962-63 (9th Cir.2004). Further, Hovhannisyan’s airport statement does not just lack detail, but contradicts what he later claimed, see id. at 963…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.