Rosa

Rosa v. Cutter Pontiac Buick GMC of Waipahu, Inc.

Good Law
120 F. App'x 76
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 12, 2005No. 02-17003; D.C. No. CV-01-00766-DAE/BMKCalifornia424 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Kevin and Lilly Rosa (the Rosas) appeal the district court’s granting of Cutter Pontiac Buick GMC’s motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Rosas contend that their complaint and supporting exhibits adequately allege consummation of the credit transaction, and, therefore, the defendant may be held to answer for alleged violations of the Truth in Lending Act.

Regulation Z defines consummation as “the time that a consumer becomes contractually obligated on a credit transaction.” Jackson v. Grant, 890 F.2d 118, 120 (9th Cir.1989) (quoting 12 C.F.R. § 226.2 (a)(13)). “When a consumer ‘becomes contractually obligated’ is, in turn, determined by looking to state law[.]” Id. In Hawaii, a credit sale contract must be in writing; contain, incorporate by reference, or otherwise clearly refer to all the agreement of the parties; and be signed by the parties. H.R.S. § 476 — 3(a)(1)—(3).

The Rosas did not sign the Credit Sale Contract. However, they did sign the Addendum to the Credit Sale Contract, which is described as “intended to be the front page of the Credit Sale Contract.”

When reviewing motions for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.