Pierce
United States v. Pierce
120 F. App'x 107
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 13, 2005No. 03-10382California106 words
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Rickey Lane Pierce appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his motion to correct restitution. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.
Pierce contends, inter alia, that his motion to correct the restitution amount under 18 U.S.C. § 3572 (d)(3) was not procedurally improper. Because section 3572 does not offer Pierce an avenue for relief, the district court did not err.
AFFIRMED. 1
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
. All pending motions are denied.