Cruz

Cruz v. Ashcroft

Good Law
120 F. App'x 139
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 2005No. 03-74544California283 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Lilian Cruz, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an *140 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her motion to reopen an in absentia deportation proceeding. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). Socop-Gonzalez v. INS, 272 F.3d 1176, 1183 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc). We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and we review de novo the interpretation of purely legal questions. Id. at 1187 . We deny the petition for review.

Cruz admits that she was aware of an upcoming hearing, but did not contact the immigration court for eighteen years. Although Cruz contacted the government twice during the eighteen years to pursue other forms of relief, she failed to reveal her original alien registration number. The IJ properly determined that Cruz did not establish that the eighteen-year delay in filing the motion “was caused by circumstances beyond [her] control.” Socop-Gonzalez, 272 F.3d at 1193 .

As Cruz did not act with due diligence, she is not entitled to equitable tolling of her motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.