Ang

Ang v. Ashcroft

Good Law
120 F. App'x 180
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 18, 2005No. 03-74388California275 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Sherron Cabrera Ang is a native and citizen of the Philippines. She petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision to deny Ang’s application for asylum and withholding of removal. We dismiss in part, and deny in part.

Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a)(3), Ang’s asylum claim is unreviewable by this court *181 because the BIA determined that the claim was untimely. See Hakeem v. INS, 273 F.3d 812, 815 (9th Cir.2001).

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a) and review for substantial evidence Ang’s eligibility for withholding of removal. See Hakeem, 273 F.3d at 816 . Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of withholding of removal because Ang’s testimony and application do not establish that it is “more likely than not” that she will face persecution on account of her ethnicity upon returning to the Philippines. See id. at 816-17 .

Pursuant to Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), and Salvador-Calleros v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 959 (9th Cir.2004), petitioner’s motion for stay of removal included a timely request for stay of voluntary departure. Because the stay of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.