Staber

United States v. Staber

Good Law
120 F. App'x 676
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 10, 2005Nos. 04-30024, 04-30025; No. 04-30033; D.C. No. CR-03-00028-DWMCalifornia1,426 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Appellant Rebecca Staber entered a conditional plea of guilty to a charge of maintaining a premises for manufacturing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 856 (a)(2). Appellant Ronnie Staber entered a conditional plea of guilty to conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C), and 846. Appellant David Chase entered a conditional plea of guilty *678 to two charges of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C), and 846, as well as one charge of knowing possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1)(B)(i). All the appellants appeal from the district court’s rejection of their motion to suppress evidence seized during the execution of a search warrant (the “Mount Avenue” warrant) on February 18, 2003. Appellant Chase also appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during the execution of a search warrant (the “Twilight Lane” warrant) at his residence in Frenchtown, Montana on October 4, 2001. Finally, Mr. Chase appeals from the district court’s drug quantity determination…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.