Connell
San Lazaro Ass'n v. Connell
122 F. App'x 387
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 2005No. 03-56164; D.C. No. CV-98-06216-RJKCalifornia50 words
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
The District Court’s denial of Defendant-Appellant’s request for attorney’s *388 fees did not constitute an abuse of its discretion.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.