Alarid

United States v. Alarid

Good Law
123 F. App'x 294
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 2005No. 04-50010. D.C. No. CR-02-02549-NAJCalifornia299 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Roman Alarid pled guüty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and was sentenced to 130 months in prison. On appeal, he challenges the district court’s imposition of a two-level enhancement for firearms possession under U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(l) as both an improper application of the sentencing guidelines and a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to jury determination of the facts underlying the enhancement.

The government urged that this appeal be dismissed, citing a waiver of appellate rights contained in Alarid’s plea agreement. On de novo review, United States v. Smith, 389 F.3d 944, 953 (9th Cir.2004), however, we find the waiver unenforceable. Although the district court mentioned the possibility of such a waiver during the plea colloquy, it failed to discuss the specific terms of the waiver and ensure Alarid’s understanding as required by Fed. R.Crim.P. ll(b)(l)(N). This omission was plain error. See United States v. Arellano-Gallegos, 387 F.3d 794, 797 (9th Cir. 2004). Because the waiver was not knowingly and voluntarily made, see id. at 796 , it cannot be enforced.

Alarid’s 130-month sentence was within the range that could have been imposed even…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.