Allen

Allen v. Calderon

Good Law
123 F. App'x 767
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 3, 2005No. 02-16917; D.C. No. CV-01-05994-OWW/DLBCalifornia1,666 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Ernest Lee Allen appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for failure to prosecute. Specifically, Allen asserts that the district court erred in not considering the evidence of his incompetence before dismissing the petition. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253 and will reverse and remand for further proceedings.

*768 The circumstances of Allen’s conviction have no bearing on this appeal. Proceeding pro se, Allen filed a federal habeas corpus petition claiming that his sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment. The petition was unsigned. The district court issued an order requiring Allen to submit an amendment within thirty days, which included his signature. Two weeks later, Allen filed an amended petition which contained a photocopy, rather than an original, of his signature, and added two additional claims for ineffective assistance of counsel.

The district court sua sponte issued an order to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust the new claims. The order also reiterated the court’s demand that Allen submit an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.