Dewalt

United States v. Dewalt

Good Law
123 F. App'x 804
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 2005No. 04-30107California418 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Defendant William DeWalt stands convicted, after a jury trial, of distribution of a controlled substance resulting in death, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), and being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). We affirm.

1. On de novo review, United States v. Naghani, 361 F.3d 1255, 1261 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 341 , 160 L.Ed.2d 247 (2004), we hold that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction under § 841(a)(1). Defendant sold 20 “Methadose” brand methadone pills to the decedent. One Methadose brand pill was found in the decedent’s possession at the time of his death, which occurred not long after this sale. The decedent died of a methadone overdose. Although the defense argued that the decedent traded Methadose brand pills with Wiren for “Roxane” brand pills, Wiren denied the trade. A rational finder of fact could find causation beyond a reasonable doubt.

2. We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of Defendant’s motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. United States *806 v. Holmes, 229 F.3d 782, 789 (9th Cir. 2000). We find no abuse of discretion. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.