Perez

United States v. Perez

Good Law
124 F. App'x 546
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 1, 2005No. 03-10681; D.C. No. CR-94-00036-JSUCalifornia324 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*547 MEMORANDUM **

Defendant Joseph Eclavea Perez appeals the sentence imposed following his conviction, after a jury trial, for distribution of heroin, 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1); possession of heroin with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1); and felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g). 1 He challenges the district court’s decision to depart upward to Criminal History Category VI and, in a supplemental brief, challenges various upward adjustments made under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.).

The court sentenced Defendant based on a drug quantity higher than that charged in the indictment, and the record before us does not show that the parties stipulated to that amount. Also, Defendant’s sentence was adjusted upward under U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(a) based on the judge’s finding that Defendant was an “organizer or leader of a criminal activity that involved five or more participants or was otherwise extensive.” 2 Without those adjustments, the total offense level for the drug group would have been 14, more than nine levels less serious than the felon-in-possession group, resulting in a total offense level of 25, not 26.

Accordingly, we VACATE…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.