Dowton

Six Flags v. Dowton

Good Law
125 F. App'x 122
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 2005No. 02-36052; D.C. No. CV-01-00089-BLWCalifornia495 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Appellants Jimmie and Denise Dowton appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Appellee U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency, (FSA). This case arises out of a suit in state court brought by Six Flags Inc., the Estate of Merle Hone, and the George Hone Testamentary Trust against the Dowtons. As part of that suit, the Dow-tons attempted to fix liability on the FSA and Bradley McMurtrey, a farm loan manager with the FSA, by bringing claims against them as third-party defendants. The federal defendants removed the case to district court. The district court issued several orders dealing with the Dowtons’ claims, culminating in a grant of summary judgment to the third-party defendants. The Dowtons appeal.

The Dowtons’ principal contention is that the district court erred in concluding that McMurtrey was a federal employee acting within the scope of his employment under the Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 1988, 28 U.S.C. § 2679 (d)(2). The government certified that McMurtrey was acting within the scope of his employment at the time he made the challenged statements concerning the Dowtons’ financial condition. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.