Finn

Murphy v. Finn

Good Law
125 F. App'x 774
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 2005No. 04-16016California217 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*775 MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Odis S. Murphy, III, appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We review de novo the denial of a § 2254 petition. See Robinson v. Ignacio, 360 F.3d 1044, 1055 (9th Cir.2004).

Murphy contends that his Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated when the trial court denied his request for counsel, raised just prior to jury selection. The California Court of Appeal rejected this claim on the basis that Murphy had twice previously waived his right to counsel under Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), and his request for an attorney just prior to jury selection was within the trial court’s discretion to deny because it was untimely and suspect. This decision was not contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as determined by the United States Supreme Court. See Robinson, 360 F.3d at 1058 (citing Menefield v. Borg, 881 F.2d 696, 700-01 (9th Cir.1989)).

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.