Wong

Wong v. Gonzales

Good Law
125 F. App'x 846
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 2005No. 04-73284; Agency No. A77-293-057California257 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Shana Wong, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for asylum. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, and reverse only if the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the determination that Wong has not experienced persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir.2003). Substantial evidence also supports the conclusion that Wong does not have a well-founded fear of persecution. After moving to the city, Wong, along with her mother and sister, attended church on a regular basis without incident. Moreover, Wong’s mother and sister continue to practice their faith in China unharmed. See Hakeem v. INS, 273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir.2001) (stating that continual presence of similarly-situated family members and applicant’s practice of faith without incident undercuts claim of persecution).

Because Wong failed to establish the threshold showing that she experienced past…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.