North Star Terminal & Stevedore Co. v. Nugget Construction Inc.

Good Law
126 F. App'x 348
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 2005Nos. 02-35887, 03-35168, 03-35174, 03-35175; D.C. No. CV-98-00009-A-HRHCalifornia850 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Nugget Construction (“Nugget”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to North Star, Metco and Shoreside (“appellees”). The appellees cross-appeal the district court’s denial of attorney’s fees and application of a 4.25% simple interest rate. Because material issues of fact remain, we reverse the grant of summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.

A. Liability under the Miller Act

“Recovery under the Miller Act is limited to those who have a direct contractual relationship, express or implied, with the prime contractor or ... a subcontractor of the prime contractor.” Fid. & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Harris, 360 F.2d 402, 408 (9th Cir.1966); see also 40 U.S.C. § 270b(a) (2001); J.W. Bateson Co. v. United States ex rel. Bd. of Trustees of Nat’l Automatic Sprinkler Indus. Pension Fund, 434 U.S. 586, 589 , 98 S.Ct. 873 , 55 L.Ed.2d 50 (1978). The appellees never entered into express contracts with Nugget, and we have already held that Spencer Rock acted not as a subcontractor but as a materialman on this project. See United States v. Nugget Constr., Inc., 19 Fed.Appx. 705 (9th Cir.2001) (unpublished memorandum decision). The appellees contend…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.