Balogun

Balogun v. Gonzales

Good Law
126 F. App'x 874
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 2005No. 03-74046California341 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Petitioner Adekunle Balogun (“Balogun”), a native of Nigeria, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA’s”) affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ’s”) order of removal based on Balogun’s presence in the United States without having been admitted or paroled, and his conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude. Balogun also seeks review of the IJ’s and BIA’s denial of asylum, withholding of removal under the INA and under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), deferral under CAT, adjustment of status under INA § 245(a), waiver of inadmissibility under INA § 212(h), and voluntary departure.

The IJ found that Balogun’s conviction for credit card fraud, resulting in over $97,000 in loss to his victims, was a crime of moral turpitude. Balogun’s failure to raise this issue in his brief to the BIA constitutes both a waiver of and a failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Balogun’s crime was one of moral turpitude. The crime was also an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(M), because it involved fraud in which the loss to the victims exceeded $10,000. It was also a particularly serious crime. Balogun also failed to demonstrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.