Weissleader

Weissleader v. County of Riverside

Good Law
127 F. App'x 351
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 2005No. 04-55535California343 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Patricia Weissleader appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal without prejudice *352 of her action alleging that the County of Riverside violated her rights in various ways including racketeering, harassment and warrantless searches. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to prosecute, Al-Torki v. Kaempen, 78 F.3d 1381, 1384 (9th Cir.1996), and for failure to comply with the court’s order requiring submission of an amended complaint in a timely manner, Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.1992). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed Weissleader’s action for failure to prosecute because Weissleader failed to submit a proposed second amended complaint within the enlarged time she had requested and obtained. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1260-61 . In addition, the district court gave proper consideration to the various factors required to evaluate whether dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) was appropriate. See id.; Al-Torki, 78 F.3d at 1384 .

Weissleader contends that the district court erroneously concluded that her original complaint and proposed first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.