Singh

MEMORANDUM **

Harjeet Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review an adverse credibility finding for substantial evidence, Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir.2000), and we reverse only if the evidence compels a contrary conclusion, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s decision. Singh’s testimony regarding his purported medical treatment for his alleged beatings was internally inconsistent, vague, and conflicted with the information contained in the physician’s letter presented at the hearing. See Pal v. INS, 204 F.3d 935, 938 (9th Cir.2000). In addition, several documents Singh presented in order to establish his identity were also directly contradicted by his own testimony. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003) (noting that identity is key element of asylum claim); Chebchoub v. INS, 257…