Antonini

Antonini v. Neary

Good Law
127 F. App'x 916
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 2005No. 03-17087; D.C. No. CV-03-00312-SICalifornia303 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Alfred J. Antonini appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s dismissal with prejudice of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of Gelso Investments V, LLC, whose sole members are Antonini and his wife. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d). We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s decision to dismiss a bankruptcy appeal under Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 8001(a) and 8006, see Fitzsimmons v. Nolden, 920 F.2d 1468 , 1472 (9th Cir.1990), and to impose sanctions for non-compli *917 anee with non-jurisdictional bankruptcy procedural requirements, see Sierra Switchboard Co. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 789 F.2d 705 , 706-07 (9th Cir.1986).

We affirm.

Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8006 requires an appellant to file a statement of issues and designation of record within ten days of filing the notice of appeal. Applying Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8001(a), the district court properly dismissed with prejudice Antonini’s bankruptcy appeal for failure to prosecute because, eleven months after filing his notice of appeal, with sufficient opportunities to comply despite his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.