Zargaryan

MEMORANDUM ***

Garnik Zargaryan, a native of Iran and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, which affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum, withholding of re *673 moval and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 .

Where, as here, the BIA conducted a de novo review of the record and made an independent determination of whether relief is appropriate, this Court reviews the decision of the BIA. See Molina-Morales v. INS, 287 F.3d 1048, 1050 (9th Cir.2001). We review for substantial evidence, Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Zargaryan contends that the IJ erred by finding that he was not credible and that he did not establish past persecution. We disagree. Even assuming Zargaryan testified credibly, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Zargaryan failed to establish that any harm he suffered was due to a protected ground. See Rostomi-an v. INS, 210 F.3d 1088, 1089 (9th Cir. 2000).

Because Zargaryan did not establish eligibility for asylum, it follows that…