Medina

United States v. Medina

Good Law
130 F. App'x 862
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 2005No. 04-10361; D.C. No. CR-03-00299-KJDCalifornia806 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

John Clayderman Medina (“Medina”) pled guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). Medina appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of a weapon discovered during a Terry search of Medina and his backpack. Because Medina concedes that the officers had reasonable suspicion to conduct a Terry stop and also had reasonable suspicion to frisk his person for weapons, the only issue on appeal is whether Officer Burke’s search of Medina’s backpack exceeded the legitimate scope of a protective search under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).

The district court’s denial of a motion to suppress is reviewed de novo and its factual findings are reviewed for clear error. United States v. Sandoval, 390 F.3d 1077, 1080 (9th Cir.2004).

Medina contends the officers lacked reason to fear for their safety because Medina had already been patted down and was extremely compliant. He also claims it was generally unreasonable for the officers to suspect that Medina would attempt to reach for a weapon located inside a closed backpack while two armed officers confronted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.