Hanline

United States v. Hanline

Good Law
131 F. App'x 91
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 2005No. 04-50303California706 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Cara Hanline conditionally pled guilty, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(a)(2), to violating 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) by possessing more than 500 grams of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. Hanline now appeals the dis *92 trict court’s denial of her motion to suppress the introduction as evidence of drugs found in the back seat of her car subsequent to her -arrest. Because law enforcement officials had probable cause, 1 we affirm.

We have summarized the probable cause standard as follows:

United States v. Henderson, 241 F.3d 638, 647-48 (9th Cir.2000) (citations and quotations omitted, first two alterations in original). When, as here, an arrest or search is based substantially on tips provided by an informant, that individual’s reliability and his basis for knowing the information provided are “highly relevant” in determining whether the tips establish probable cause. Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 230 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983).

In this case, the confidential informant’s reliability is firmly established. Drug Enforcement Agency Agent Barry Koch testified that he had worked with the informant “on a regular basis” on “at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.