Skolnick

Skolnick v. Federal Aviation Administration

Good Law
133 F. App'x 368
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 2005No. 03-73233; FAA No. Notam 3/2123California337 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Sanford Skolnick filed this petition to challenge the constitutionality of the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA”) Notice to Airmen (“NOTAM”) 3/2123, which prohibits flights under 3000 feet within a three-nautical-mile radius of the Disneyland Theme Park in Anaheim, California. A petition to challenge an order of the FAA “must be filed not later than 60 days after the order is issued. The court may allow the petition to be filed after the 60th day only if there are reasonable grounds for not filing by the 60th day.” 49 U.S.C. § 46110 (a).

Skolnick did not file his petition within sixty days of the date of the issuance of NOTAM 3/2123. He has not shown reasonable grounds why this court should excuse his untimely filing. See Sierra Club v. Skinner, 885 F.2d 591, 593 (9th Cir.1989) (refusing to find reasonable grounds for filing late even when “the FAA ha[d] created a confusing situation” leading to the petitioner filing in the wrong court and missing the deadline to file in the court of appeals).

Skolnick’s argument that he could not have filed earlier because he lacked standing to challenge NOTAM 3/2123 before he learned of Gay Days is unpersuasive. Standing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.