Automotive Global Technologies, Ltd. v. Alto Products Corp.

Good Law
134 F. App'x 119
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 2005Nos. 03-15877, 03-15885; D.C.No. CV-99-00065-RAMCalifornia1,504 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rymer, J.

MEMORANDUM **

Automotive Global Technologies, Ltd. (“AGT”), a Nevada corporation, appeals the district court’s decision to grant partial summary judgment and dismiss tort-based fraud claims asserted by AGT and its Chief Executive Officer, Bruce Palmbaum, against Sonnax Industries, Inc. (“Sonnax”), a Vermont corporation.

AGT and Palmbaum also appeal, and Sonnax cross-appeals, a second set of decisions issued by the district court following a bench trial on the remaining breach of contract issues.

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 1332(a), and we affirm in part and reverse in part. The facts in this case are familiar to the parties and need not be recited here.

I.

We affirm the district court’s dismissal of the tort-based fraud claims. 1 The parties do not dispute the district court’s decision to apply Nevada law to these claims. AGT offered no evidence from which a rational trier of fact could find that Sonnax made representations known at the time of entering the contract to be false or without sufficient basis.

II.

The district court did not err by denying AGT and Palmbaum a hearing on the motion for partial summary judgment. The denial of a request…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.