Najar-Esperiqueta
United States v. Najar-Esperiqueta
134 F. App'x 201
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 2005No. 05-50001; D.C. No. CR-99-02020-NAJCalifornia104 words
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Adalberto Najar-Esperiqueta appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release. The district court lacked *202 jurisdiction to revoke Najar-Esperiqueta’s supervised release after the supervision, term had expired because no warrant, based upon sworn allegations, was issued during the supervision term as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (i). United States v. Vargas-Amaya, 389 F.3d 901 (9th Cir.2004).
The district court’s order is therefore VACATED and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *202 courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.