Joo Yeon Park v. Gonzales

Good Law
135 F. App'x 85
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 2005Nos. 03-74158, 03-74162 and 03-74164California382 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Joo Yeon Park and her sons, Sung Bok Lee and Sung Jun Lee, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the decision of the Immigration Judge finding the petitioners removable and denying voluntary departure. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a), and we deny the petitions.

Park contends, on her own behalf and on the behalf of her two sons, that she should not have been placed into removal proceedings because her failure to timely file an application for adjustment of status was not willful, but rather because she was the victim of fraud. The IJ, although sympathetic to Park’s unfortunate situation, found that because the Immigration and Naturalization Service had denied Park’s application for an adjustment in status, he lacked the authority, equitable or otherwise, to review the INS’s decision and to permit her to remain in the United States. We agree. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (g); 8 C.F.R. § 1240.1 (a); see also Barahona-Gomez v. Reno, 236 F.3d 1115, 1119 (9th Cir.2001) (“[T]he immigration judge is not empowered to review the wisdom of the INS in instituting the proceedings.”) (quoting Lopez-Telles v. INS, 564 F.2d 1302, 1304…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.