Montalvo

United States v. Montalvo

Good Law
135 F. App'x 90
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 2005No. 03-10480California202 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Michael L. Montalvo appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion, brought under former Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a), to correct the life sentence imposed upon resentencing for his 1989 conviction for operating a continuing criminal enterprise, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court’s ruling on a motion brought under former Rule 35(a) for “illegality or gross abuse of discretion,” United States v. Housepian, 359 F.3d 1144 , 1153 (9th Cir.2004) (en banc), and we affirm.

Montalvo contends that the district court grossly abused its discretion when it denied his Rule 35(a) motion. We disagree. The district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the law of the case doctrine foreclosed consideration of his arguments. See United States v. Alexander, 106 F.3d 874, 876 (9th Cir.1997) (stating that a court is generally precluded from reconsidering an issue that has already been decided by the same court or a higher court in the identical case).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.