Singh

Singh v. Gonzales

Good Law
135 F. App'x 115
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 2005No. 04-70343California223 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Ajeet Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum, *116 withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility determination, Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding. The IJ offered specific, cogent reasons for the decision based on inconsistencies between petitioner’s testimony and documentary evidence and inconsistencies within petitioner’s testimony, including regarding whether police were looking for him and whether his friend was arrested. See id. at 1043 .

Because petitioner failed to demonstrate that he was eligible for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

Because petitioner does not challenge the denial of CAT relief in his opening brief, the claim is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.