Aghajani

Aghajani v. Gonzales

Good Law
135 F. App'x 946
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 2005No. 04-73099California319 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Vaichik Aghajani, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions for review of the Board, of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)' decision, which affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 .

‘Where, as here, the BIA adopts the IJ’s decision while adding its own reasons, we review both decisions.” See Kataria v. INS, 232 F.3d 1107, 1112 (9th Cir.2000). We review for substantial evidence, Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny this petition for review.

The government contends that because Aghajani’s opening brief failed to challenge the IJ’s denial of asylum based on Aghajani’s failure to comply with fingerprint processing requirements, Aghajani has waived the issue. We agree. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996). The IJ’s fingerprint processing determination is dispositive of Aghajani’s eligibility for asylum.

The government also contends that Aghajani is not eligible for withholding of removal because Aghajani failed to establish a clear probability of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.