Bulankov

MEMORANDUM ***

Yuriy Vladimirovich Bulankov, a native and citizen of Belarus, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings following an in absentia order of removal. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002), we deny the petition for review in part and dismiss in part.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by finding that Bulankov’s motion to reopen was untimely and did not warrant., equitable tolling. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C) (requiring a motion to reopen based on “exceptional circumstances” to be filed within 180 days after the date of the in absentia removal order). Bulankov’s motion was filed approximately two years after the IJ ordered him removed in absentia. To invoke equitable tolling, Bulankov contends he was defrauded by a “notario” who falsely stated she was an attorney. While Bulankov submitted an affidavit attesting to the agreement with the “notario,” he failed in all other respects to comply with the procedural…