Jimenes Maldonado v. Gonzales

Good Law
136 F. App'x 84
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 2005No. 03-72723; Agency No. A72-133-942California213 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Elba Yaneth Jimenes Maldonado, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an *85 Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility determination, Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding. The IJ offered specific, cogent reasons for the decision based on inconsistencies between petitioner’s application, asylum interview, and testimony, including regarding the alleged 1992 attack on petitioner’s home by guerrillas. See id. at 1043 .

Because petitioner does not challenge the IJ’s denial of withholding of removal and CAT relief in her opening brief, the claims are waived. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir. 1996).

The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. See Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.