Evergreen International Airlines, Inc. v. Asiana Airlines

Good Law
136 F. App'x 95
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 20, 2005No. 03-35886California1,316 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Following a jury verdict awarding $16,630,394 in damages to Evergreen International Airlines, the district court denied Asiana Airlines’ motion for judgment *97 as a matter of law. Asiana appeals the judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

Oregon Revised Statutes section 72.7080(2), like the Uniform Commercial Code, provides that when the traditional measure of contract damages is not sufficient to “put the seller in as good a position as performance would have done then the measure of damages is the profit (including reasonable overhead) which the seller would have made from full performance by the buyer....” See also Trienco, Inc. v. Applied Theory, Inc., 102 Or.App. 362 , 794 P.2d 1239, 1241-42 (1990). Although Oregon has not specifically considered whether this lost volume measure of damages applies beyond the specific context of contracts for the sale of goods, most other jurisdictions to consider the issue have extended the theory to include various types of providers of services. See Gianetti v. Norwalk Hosp., 266 Conn. 544 , 833 A.2d 891 , 895-96 & n. 4 (2003) (employment contracts); Jetz Serv. Co., Inc. v. Salina…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.