Paniagua

United States v. Paniagua

Good Law
137 F. App'x 34
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 23, 2005NoS. 03-50326, 03-50338California440 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Paniagua and Abraham Del Real were tried before a jury and were each convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 , attempted possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 , 841(a)(1), conspiracy to possess a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). Paniagua appeals his sentence. Del Real appeals his conviction and sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm Del Real’s conviction. We remand both sentences for further consideration.

A. Paniagua’s Sentence: Denial of Downward Adjustment for Minor Role

Paniagua argues that he was entitled to a downward adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b) for his minor role in the drug conspiracy. The district court found that Paniagua supplied transportation for two other co-participants to the buy location, cash for the purchase of methamphetamine, and weapons for himself and Del Real. Consequently, the court found that Paniagua played an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.