Wisenbaker

Wisenbaker v. Farwell

Good Law
137 F. App'x 80
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 2005No. 04-17220California242 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Larry M. Wisenbaker, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we vacate and remand.

Wisenbaker contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s (“AED-PA”) one-year limitations period because his attorney failed to deliver his file to him until after his deadline expired. It is undisputed that Wisenbaker did not receive his records until approximately five months after his AEDPA deadline. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is vacated and this case is remanded to the district court to provide Wisenbaker an opportunity to more fully develop the record and to determine whether the statute of limitations should be equitably tolled. See United States v. Battles, 362 F.3d 1195, 1197-99 (9th Cir.2004). Though Wisenbaker filed a late § 2254 petition before receiving records from his attorney, this does not undermine his equitable tolling claim. See id. at 1198 n. 5.

To the extent that Wisenbaker raises issues not included in the Certificate of Appealability (“COA”), we construe…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.